Показаны сообщения с ярлыком domestic cars. Показать все сообщения
Показаны сообщения с ярлыком domestic cars. Показать все сообщения

Thoughts on Porsche’s Troubles

| четверг, 27 августа 2009 г.

2010 Porsche Boxster S1

2010 Porsche Boxster S1

We’re going to do a little speculating here. But these thoughts are not blue-sky blah-blah; they are based on what has been reported in the last few days about Porsche. It seems to me that the company may be in big trouble, and here are the reasons.

With Volkswagen planning a full merger with Porsche by 2011, CEO Martin Winterkorn is putting the heat on to get the volume up—big-time. We recently reported that Porsche has been given a well-nigh impossible sales goal of 150,000 cars per year by 2012. With the company presently selling 75,000 cars a year, such a requirement means: a) lowering prices, adding incentives, etc., or b) making some newer, cheaper models for a wider market.

With its debt load reaching close to $9 billion, Porsche will find these alternatives hard to execute. Winterkorn says he wants a new car smaller than the Boxster, a junior Cayenne, and some kind of new Panamera. Maybe he’s talking about the BlueSport roadster (below) for the former, which would be nice.

VW BlueSport RoadsterSo our brother/sister bloggers are speculating about zingy new cars, which of course is what Marty wants them to do. But the reality is that Porsche’s (and VW’s) stock is doing badly; there is actually a glut of inventory, with dealers holding more than 100 days’ supply of 911s, Caymans, and Boxsters; and production has been cut back.

The Truth About Cars reported these problems, and its commenters were quick to add their two cents:

As I recall, Porsche almost bought the farm the last time we had a recession of this magnitude (late ’80s, early ’90s). The mortgage brokers, stockbrokers, realtors and other assorted financial hucksters that bought these [cars] are now waiting tables at TGI Fridays.

Others pointed out that Porsche’s cars have been overpriced for years. Another, looking at figures on AutoTrader, found that “Porsche sold just 651 new 911s last month if you total up all the various configurations.” From this to 150,000 units a year??

My son, who is not a financial huckster, owns a 2004 911-C2 and told me he needed two new rear tires, again, at about $300 per. They last only 10-15,000 miles. Then there’s the regular Mobil-1 12-quart oil change that will run you around $200, including filter and labor.

You know the old saw attributed to J.P. Morgan: When asked about the cost of buying a yacht, the financier replied, “If you have to ask, then you probably can’t afford it.” It would be a shame to see Porsche go the way of Morgan’s yacht.

Do you think we’ll see newer, cheaper Porsches? Or devalued, less-expensive Boxsters and Cayennes?

—jgoods

Share this post: Live MySpace



Related posts:



Related posts:



The Ugliest Cars of 2009 and 2010

| вторник, 18 августа 2009 г.

Some cars are just plain ugly.

While most of the very worst have been weeded out by time, new entries in the ugly contest keep popping up. For model years 2009 and 2010, here are some of the ugliest:

2009-chrysler-town-and-country

This thing looks like it should ride on tracks and push cows out of the way of oncoming locomotives.

2009_bentley_brooklands

Even a car that costs nearly $400,000 can’t manage to look any better than a $30,000 Chrysler. Boooo!

2010-ford-transit-connect

Hey, just because a car is ugly doesn’t mean it isn’t cool. Check out this blogger’s take on it, and I’ll bet you’ll want one if Ford builds a consumer version. I do.

2009_honda_fit

This car is horribly out of proportion. Huge headlights, over-size nose, and tiny wheels. Not good.

2010 Scion iQ

2010_scion_iq

Really? Is this a character in Pixar’s Cars 2 or a new Matchbox creation? Surely it isn’t a roadworthy car from Toyota….

2009_nissan_cube

Go ahead, view this car from any angle. Try to find its good side. Nope, it doesn’t exist.

2009-honda-ridgeline

Either make a truck or make an SUV. But never… ever… add a truck bed to an SUV. Unless you’re the Chevy Avalanche - that works. The Ridgeline doesn’t.

2009-acura

Put that grille on anything, whether it be an otherwise beautiful Lexus, a smokin’ hot Ferrari, or a purring Jag, and it’ll be rendered instantly and hideously ugly forever.

What are the ugliest new cars or concepts that you’ve seen?

-tgriffith





Related posts:



Related posts:



Chrysler Walks the Plank

| среда, 5 августа 2009 г.

President Obama said in his Wednesday press conference that he doesn’t want to be in the car business—to which we can all say Amen. When he announced this noon that Chrysler was going to proceed with Chapter 11, he put forward the hope that it would be quick (maybe 30-60 days), would establish a strong relationship with Fiat, and would represent a new beginning on the road to better cars. Who can argue with that?

The one point that may have gotten lost in the reporting was the President’s remark that this move “will save more than 30,000 jobs.” That to me is the administration’s bottom line, the reason why they worked so hard and to the last minute to avoid bankruptcy. It was the thrust of their “rescue” policy. Dumping those people into the defunct Michigan economy would have been simply unacceptable.

Whether the UAW benefit fund, now Chrysler’s presumed 55-percent shareholder, can run a car company any better than the government remains to be seen. But the U.S. and Canadian governments are still going to contribute billions more when the company emerges and restarts.

The 84-year-old Chrysler firm will remain in business, albeit haltingly, during the process, and CEO Bob Nardelli will step aside after the bankruptcy concludes. Chrysler financing will be available through GMAC, as Chrysler Financial departs. An unknown number of the automaker’s 3,600 dealers will close. Suppliers will generally remain in place.

Here are more details, as of 3:00 pm today. Fiat is to receive a 20 percent stake in the company, which could rise to 35 percent.

The U.S. Treasury Department, meanwhile, will own 8% of Chrysler, and the governments of Canada and Ontario, which will provide $2.4 billion in financing, will hold a combined 2% stake.

The company’s 54,000 employees and its 115,000 retirees, represented by the United Auto Workers’ union, late Wednesday approved their part of the bargain, eliminating a number of benefits.

While the court plan is being worked out, Chrysler said most manufacturing operations will be suspended Monday and will resume once the transaction is completed. Further layoffs aren’t expected at this point, although, once the agreement with Fiat goes through, more cost-cutting measures may be needed.

Chrysler said its operations in Mexico and Canada and other international operations aren’t part of any bankruptcy filing.

As we reported Monday, the sticking point in the restructuring has been a small group of hedge funds that took on the government for more money. In his noon statement, Mr. Obama took a tough stance against these “speculators,” as he called them. In fact, one could conclude these guys forced the bankruptcy—and the same kinds of debtholders may cause even bigger problems for GM when its turn possibly comes next month.

I just heard one of Motor Trend’s top editors (didn’t get his name) put down the just-announced Chrysler bankruptcy deal on CNN. In portentous tones, he proclaimed “big risks ahead” for the company. The problems he stated were “no product ready in the pipeline,” and the long time it will take Fiat to introduce same. Then he took the Obama administration to task for minimizing those risks.

What the world needs now is more naysayers for Chrysler. And let us note: Motor Trend’s comments are particularly ironic since Interlink, its publisher, just filed for Chapter 11. I love it when that happens.

Well, folks, what are the prospects now for a quick Chrysler bankruptcy? And what do you think of their plans for an Italian-American turnaround?

—jgoods



Related posts:



Related posts:



Schwarzenegger: a Prius or Challenger guy?

| пятница, 31 июля 2009 г.

schwarzenegger-challenger

Arnold Schwarzenegger is known for driving cars that aren’t exactly easy on the gas.

I think it’s safe to say he brought the Hummer brand to the masses, all because he just HAD to have a civilian version of the almighty H1. Now, of course, he governs the great state of California and is pushing for energy conservation and smog reduction. One might think when the time came to buy a new car, he’d play it safe and go with a Prius. Or to give him a little credit, maybe the more manly Escape Hybrid.

Right… can you picture the Terminator in a Prius? I don’t think so. Our friends at Edmunds snagged some pictures of the Governator easing into his brand-new Dodge Challenger, and not the piddly V6 version, but the king-of-the-mountain 6.1-liter, 420-horsepower SRT8.

He’ll naturally catch all kinds of flack for driving a serious gas hog while preaching about saving energy. But seriously, governor or not, he’s Arnold Schwarzenegger, and Arnold Schwarzenegger drives cool cars. 

Let’s assume he’s doing his part by installing energy-efficient windows in his house and turning lights off in all his spare rooms. The man’s got an incredibly stressful job, and if he wants to have some fun in a seriously fun car, I’m behind him. 

Tear it up, Governor! 

What do you think of Gov. Schwarzenegger’s new ride?

-tgriffith



Related posts:



Related posts:



“In these tough economic times, consumers appear to be torn on whether ...

| воскресенье, 5 июля 2009 г.

52% of survey respondents disapprove of a government bailout for GM and Ford.

Consumer sentiment mirrors initial reaction to bank bailout package.

CAMBRIDGE, Mass., Nov. 3 — CarGurus® (http://www.cargurus.com/), a leading online automotive community, today announced the results of its survey of more than 8,000 online automotive consumers worldwide. Fifty-two percent of respondents said they do not support a government bailout for General Motors and Ford. While 48% do favor some sort of bailout, the survey illustrated the lack of consumer consensus on bailouts and in particular federal support for these leading U.S. automotive manufacturers.

Lack of consensus mirrors split over bank bailout package
“In these tough economic times, consumers appear to be torn on whether to support Ford and GM with some sort of federal assistance,” remarked Langley Steinert, CEO/co-founder of CarGurus. “Not unlike the close votes in Congress on the bank bailout, the nation is split on federal assistance for private industry. Many see it as a necessary step to save jobs, but an equal proportion find it hard to stomach using public funds to support private industry.”

Survey Results
Across the CarGurus Network, respondents answered the question:

Should the government bail out GM and Ford?
(Total Votes = 8,100)
No – 52%
Yes - 48%

About CarGurus LLC
Located in Harvard Square, Cambridge, MA, CarGurus LLC is a leading online automotive community founded by Langley Steinert and Nick Shanny, formerly co-founders of TripAdvisor LLC, the 3rd largest online travel site in the world. CarGurus’ founders, board, and investors bring a wealth of experience from such leading web companies as TripAdvisor, eBay, Expedia, and Yahoo. For more information about CarGurus, visit us at www.cargurus.com.

CONTACT: Steve Halloran, Editor, CarGurus LLC
617-354-0068, x12
press@cargurus.com



Related posts:



Related posts: